In about 5 years.I know alot ask this but when is v5 coming out and will they have a bypassing scaffold like Novoline's and also add brand new modules?
Also, unless Manthe decides to develop blatant modules further, none will be updated/made for bypasses.I know alot ask this but when is v5 coming out and will they have a bypassing scaffold like Novoline's and also add brand new modules?
1 of the things that is highly requested upon and isn't that useless is officially supporting 3rd party clients like lunar and badlion.Im not exactly against blatant modules but I see how pointless and redundant blatant bypasses are, so unless they release very customizable modules designed for very strict anticheats I doubt blatant modules have much of a future.
Vape V5 itself would most likely just be a way of temporarily increasing the hype and refreshing things, im not against that in fact I think its a great thing to do once in a while but it would probably need some major unique/new things which tbh I have no idea what those could be.
Officially supporting third party clients (might) lead to legal troubles but it would certainly not be ideal as vape cannot guarantee that it will always work (which would be required if they were to officially support third party clients).1 of the things that is highly requested upon and isn't that useless is officially supporting 3rd party clients like lunar and badlion.
Most people buy Vape just for that (and it sometimes crashes). It'll probably come once they run out of ideas.
1. You don’t need a new rendition to receive new features (v5, v6, etc). It’s not as if Vape has only received 4 updates total in 8 years, check the change log.I know alot ask this but when is v5 coming out and will they have a bypassing scaffold like Novoline's and also add brand new modules?
He never said they would be remove just that it wouldn't be worked on anymoredont remove the blatant features theyre nice to have
Will there be a scripting api implemented in the future? This would stop people from asking for blatant updates as people could just make their own.1. You don’t need a new rendition to receive new features (v5, v6, etc). It’s not as if Vape has only received 4 updates total in 8 years, check the change log.
2. There will never be a future update which would add something you’d imagine in a blatant client like novoline, ie blatant scaffold, this is a ghost client.
I think that Manthe said it would take a very, very long time to make a good one and possibly rejected a suggestion about that.Will there be a scripting api implemented in the future? This would stop people from asking for blatant updates as people could just make their own.
I meant that if lunar or badlion make a big update (which they probably won't as like 50% of people that buy cosmetics are cheaters) on the client-side anticheat, just update the mappings. No need to say they officially support it and yeah, it does sound very stupid.Officially supporting third party clients (might) lead to legal troubles but it would certainly not be ideal as vape cannot guarantee that it will always work (which would be required if they were to officially support third party clients).
Its not needed and I haven't seen anyone really complaining about it other than random issues that only happen to them pretty much, since both lunar and blc are kind of "unofficially" supported and most things work. As i've said before, it is within vape's best interest to keep itself as compatible as possible but that doesn't mean officially stating that they support it. If anything they should allow bug reports for third party clients to fix meaningful issues but that's it.
Imo hacked clients that claim to "support" third party clients are stupid, they cannot support something they have no control over.
Hopefully not, blatant modules are still useful & fun even if bypasses aren't worked on. Its better if they just hide less relevant modules by default (which they're doing already).Since vapev4 is a ghost client, will manthe remove certain less used/useless blatant modules in the future?
For however long those clients remain popular i'd imagine vape would try to keep itself injectable, as it means more customers.I meant that if lunar or badlion make a big update (which they probably won't as like 50% of people that buy cosmetics are cheaters) on the client-side anticheat, just update the mappings. No need to say they officially support it and yeah, it does sound very stupid.
Oh, I jsut saw Merryzz comment its a top tier HvH client1. You don’t need a new rendition to receive new features (v5, v6, etc). It’s not as if Vape has only received 4 updates total in 8 years, check the change log.
2. There will never be a future update which would add something you’d imagine in a blatant client like novoline, ie blatant scaffold, this is a ghost client.
approve my name change request (or deny it so i can change my name again) please its been a year and 3 months1. You don’t need a new rendition to receive new features (v5, v6, etc). It’s not as if Vape has only received 4 updates total in 8 years, check the change log.
2. There will never be a future update which would add something you’d imagine in a blatant client like novoline, ie blatant scaffold, this is a ghost client.
It's not denied we just don't really do those anymore.approve my name change request (or deny it so i can change my name again) please its been a year and 3 months
Could you then maybe accept mine? I just wanted to remove this ugly underscore from my name.It's not denied we just don't really do those anymore.
oh okIt's not denied we just don't really do those anymore.