Sure, I theoretically could try to figure that out for myself. My problem is that if you can’t help me figure it out, tell me what I’m supposed to calculate, demonstrate how you calculated your way to the solution, etc, that isn’t indicative of: “This conclusion was arrived at via the exploration of data and evidence and drawing reasonable links between the two.” Instead, it reads more like: “I believe this because it’s a common thing other people say so it's probably true.” In fairness to you, though, you already stated something similar in your previous comment.
That’s really what I was trying to get to the bottom of. I can understand how higher CPS could cause fewer registered attack packets under normal conditions in 1.8.9, but that becomes a non-factor if you enable NoHitDelay because of the way attack packets work, making the highest CPS you can get using AC still theoretically the best for hit reg, kb, etc, assuming you don’t have any concrete evidence which contradicts that, and it doesn’t appear that you do. That means I still have every reason to believe high CPS > low CPS in terms of hit reg and nothing concrete which would suggest that my assumption is flawed. If you happen to come across anything concrete in support of your hypothesis, I’d love to hear about it. It’s been fun talking. Peace.
