the only issue with lite is that admins don't care abt it
The sole purpose of vape lite is in order to bypass screenshares and provide basic ghost modules. We maintain the screenshare protection which is the most important thing. We have no intention of adding new modules that will just be detected, i.e. lag advantage modules. We'd be more likely to remove unsafe ones but it's not really necessary. There's also no plans to add bloat by adding modules that are only useful on servers that don't screenshare. We truly do not want you ever using vape lite unless you're actually using it on a server that legitimately screenshares.
I feel like swapping reach with lag backtrack would be a fair compromise between detectability and basic features. Assuming it’s a smooth backtrack and not one of the ones that spike your ping every time you get within 3 blocks of a player it’ll be a while before it’s detected on a wide scale.
You have to lag at those times, that’s what gives you the advantage. “Spiking” is irrelevant, it’s just detectable through heuristics of seeing that over time your ping tends to be conveniently higher when it’s to your advantage. You could lag at disadvantageous times to even out the odds, but then you’re nerfing yourself and it provides no net advantage. It’s not a sustainable or safe concept besides being used sparingly. I don’t want to add anything more to lite that is already detected on high end anticheats. The only new features that would be considered are safe and sanitized features that are very commonly needed on servers that screenshare.
What about low values? Is it possible to detect lets say dynamic fakelag even on really low amounts without falsing, or is maintaining a module like that just not worth it due to such low amounts not giving you a relevant advantage?
Sería ideal incluir módulos sencillos como HitSelect y NoJumpDelay en Vape Lite, ya que aportarían más versatilidad y mejorarían la experiencia sin ser detectados. Hazlo posible Manthe
I was mostly talking about backtrack there actually but dynamic fakelag is a lot easier to detect either way.
Hitselect is already a thing, and if you’re asking for nojumpdelay, you probably have no idea what it does.Sería ideal incluir módulos sencillos como HitSelect y NoJumpDelay en Vape Lite, ya que aportarían más versatilidad y mejorarían la experiencia sin ser detectados. Hazlo posible Manthe
Wondering, how can fakelag be more easily detected than backtrack?
Simple answer. It doesn't BackTrack does what its name suggests: it hits the player from their old position, which is much more detectable than stopping packets and flooding them in again.
why not add inbound/outbound fakelag to ping spoof
he said the other way, fakelag being easier to detect than backtrack
i meant as latency mode
and I wasn't talking to you
I was referring to having its own module, what there is is the default option in aimtassist, but you can't modify the probability as you could in a module.
Exactly FakeLag is easier to detect than BackTrack
Holy shit my brain is malfunctioning
paraphrasing (did i invent a word?) isn't helpful
