Silent Hitboxes
- Thread starter Gab
- Start date
You couldn't really use SilentAura for this if you're not using AutoClicker/Holding left mouse
(Or if you're using AutoClicker at the same time and don't want to auto-hit with SilentAura)
Last edited:
bootx64efi
Active Member
using silentaura + autoclicker causes doubleclicks, regardless of if youre using require mouse down or not - good AC's will ban you for this (MMC for sure, maybe polar)
+1 for this idea
What are you talking about? It does not cause double clicks.
How could you confirm/debunk this? Are there any doubleclick check servers?
edit: regardless that's not a solution if you don't use autoclicker
bootx64efi
Active Member
i was told this by vape support via email + go on loiysa anticheat test server, enable AGC (old leak build, but works regardless) turn on silentaura and autoclicker, then try only using autoclicker - you will flag a lot more with aura and clicker enabled.
I tested and you're wrong
bootx64efi
Active Member
"If you're using autoclicker and silentaura at the same time that could be unsafe." - Manthe, via email...
And when did you receive that email?
bootx64efi
Active Member
Oct. 25th 2024
Well I don't know what to tell you, the information is outdated probably, trust me, silentaura does NOT conflict with AutoClicker, unless SilentAura has Require Mouse Down enabled
They do conflict, it would be using two autoclickers at the same time. That means potential double clicks and unexpected randomization. Even if you attempt to "turn off" the autoclicker of silentaura by setting the cps to 0, that's not intended behavior on its own and could cause issues. You should really only ever use one or the other at a time.
I have tested it, and it does not seem like they conflict.
If you set AutoClicker to ridiculously high CPS, and set SilentAura to very small CPS, you will observe that when attacking with SilentAura, it only clicks what the SilentAura CPS is set to and completely ignores AutoClicker.
Also when doing that, you can then try to manually click and only that activates AutoClicker.
I'm not saying you're wrong - it's your client and you certainly know more about it, but I just don't see the modules conflicting with each other, even when I tested multiple times.
Wouldn't it be better to disable one of them if a user attempts to use both at the same time? Like temporarily disabling autoclicker if a user is currently using silentaura if require mouse down is enabled in both modules.
I suppose we might have to prevent it if people are frequently doing this for some reason. Require mouse down doesn’t matter I don’t know why that’s been mentioned. If both are clicking that’s unsafe. Not sure what the point is either way.
bootx64efi
Active Member
the point of using both at the same time is basically this suggestion - silent hitboxes, but the problem is, as we both stated, is that using autoclicker and silent aura (regardless of mouse down) causes randomization/double clicking issues which can be detected.
Automatically disabling the autoclicker when silent aura is targetting a person would basically implement this suggestion.
Yes that's what i'd like to see, so you don't have to disable autoclicker just to use silentaura with require mouse down.
But silentaura on its own already is “silent hotboxes” in that sense. Attempting to disable the clicking of silentaura, and then using autoclicker on top of it doesn’t make that functionality any different. Silentaura is providing the silent aiming and you’re forcing something else to do the clicking, but why? That is effectively the same thing.
The clicking of silentaura is a 1 to 1 duplicate of the autoclicker module. So I still don’t understand what the purpose is.